ReconstructionScar revisionOPCS S60.4 / S60.5
Z-plasty and W-plasty
Geometric scar revision · transposition flap geometry
Z-plasty and W-plasty are geometric scar-revision techniques that lengthen a contracture, reorient a scar into more favourable lines, or break up a straight scar visually. The Z-plasty transposes two triangular flaps to lengthen the central limb and rotate its direction; the W-plasty replaces a straight scar with multiple small triangles. Both are core techniques for managing post-skin-cancer scars, contractures over joints and scars crossing aesthetic unit borders.
CurrentLast reviewed 16 May 2026
Principles
- Z-plasty: a transposition of two adjacent triangular flaps that share a common limb (the central limb of the "Z"). It achieves:
- Lengthening of the central limb (theoretically by 25% / 50% / 75% / 100% for 30° / 45° / 60° / 75° flap angles; 60° is standard with ~75% gain).
- Reorientation of the central limb by twice the angle (60° angle → reorient by 90°).
- W-plasty: a series of small interdigitating triangles replacing a straight scar with a zig-zag. It achieves no lengthening but visually breaks up the scar and aligns sub-segments with relaxed skin tension lines (RSTLs).
Indications
- Z-plasty:
- Linear contracture across a joint (axillary, antecubital, popliteal, web spaces).
- Scar perpendicular to RSTL.
- Webbing along nasolabial, oral commissure, or paranasal regions.
- Misaligned vermilion border.
- W-plasty:
- Long straight scar crossing aesthetic boundaries (e.g. forehead, nasolabial, perioral).
- Post-skin-cancer linear scar visible at a distance.
- Avoid in highly mobile or contracture-prone areas — geometric break-up does not lengthen.
Planning and execution
- Z-plasty:
- Mark the central limb along the existing scar.
- Mark two limbs of equal length to the central limb, at 60° each (other angles for specific lengthening / reorientation).
- Excise the original scar within the central limb.
- Raise the two triangular flaps in the subdermal / deep-fascial plane respecting underlying neurovascular structures.
- Transpose flaps so that tip of A goes to base of B, and vice versa.
- Inset carefully in layers, avoiding tip tension and preserving flap vascularity.
- W-plasty:
- Plan a series of triangles 3-5 mm at base along the scar.
- Match each triangle to a precisely opposing triangle on the contralateral side.
- Excise the scar within the triangles; close interdigitating triangles primarily.
- Each segment ideally aligns with local RSTL.
Pitfalls and complications
- Inadequate undermining → flap tension and tip necrosis (commonest pitfall).
- Tip-angle <30° → unreliable distal flap survival.
- Tip-angle >75° → limited transposition / suboptimal lengthening.
- Disregarding underlying anatomy (facial nerve in cheek Z-plasty).
- W-plasty across mobile / joint-crossing scars provides no functional lengthening.
- Pin-cushioning of small triangles in elderly or sun-damaged skin.
Practical points
- For long contracture scars, multiple serial Z-plasties may be more reliable than one large Z (less tip necrosis risk).
- Four-flap Z-plasty (90°-90°) — increased lengthening (~120%); useful for first-web-space contracture.
- Five-flap (jumping-man) — combination Y-V advancement with two Z-plasties; useful in dorsal hand-web release.
- Consider intralesional / topical silicone gel post-revision (≥3 months) to optimise long-term scar appearance.
- Counsel patients that scar revision exchanges one scar pattern for another — better, not invisible.
References
- Hudson DA. Some thoughts on choosing a Z-plasty: the Z made simple. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:665-671.
- McGregor IA. Fundamental Techniques of Plastic Surgery. 9th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1995.
- Borges AF. Improvement of antitension-lines scar by the "W-plastic" operation. Br J Plast Surg. 1959;12:29-33.
- Limthongkul B et al. Z-plasty and other techniques in skin cancer scar revision. Dermatol Clin. 2019;37:495-505.
Spot a correction?
If any clinical statement, citation or link on this page needs updating, please email admin@skinoncology.net with the page name, the proposed correction and the supporting source.

