ImagingSurveillanceN/A (procedure)

Total body photography and mole mapping

TBP; digital mole mapping; whole-body photography; sequential digital dermoscopy

Total body photography (TBP), often combined with sequential digital dermoscopy imaging, is the established UK surveillance pathway for patients at high lifetime risk of melanoma — atypical mole / dysplastic naevus syndrome, familial melanoma (CDKN2A, BAP1, POT1), multiple primary melanoma, and selected high-risk groups. Two-step short-term monitoring (3-month interval) discriminates evolving melanocytic lesions from stable benign naevi. Long-term surveillance over years detects evolving change against a photographic baseline that no clinician can hold in memory. The technology cannot replace clinical judgement but reliably reduces unnecessary excisions while improving early melanoma detection in trained hands.

CurrentLast reviewed 15 May 2026

Indications

  • Multiple atypical / dysplastic naevi — particularly with personal or family history of melanoma.
  • Familial melanoma kindreds — CDKN2A, BAP1, POT1.
  • Multiple primary melanoma — high lifetime new-melanoma risk.
  • Lynch / Muir-Torre, Werner, XP, MEN2b — selected.
  • Children and adolescents with very large congenital melanocytic naevi.
  • Consistent with specialist high-risk melanoma surveillance practice; NICE NG14 supports access to dermoscopy / medical photography and personalised follow-up, but does not mandate total-body photography. Access varies by Cancer Alliance.

Technique

  • Whole-body photography — standardised set of overview images covering all skin in pre-defined poses (anterior, posterior, lateral, head, feet).
  • Sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) — dermoscopic photographs of individual lesions of concern.
  • Imaging is repeated at intervals — short-term 3-month follow-up for newly identified atypical lesions; long-term 12-monthly for the whole-body baseline.
  • Two-step monitoring — overview images identify new or changed lesions; close-up dermoscopy identifies change in known lesions.
  • Software-assisted change detection (commercial systems — Vectra, FotoFinder, Atlas) flags structural / colour change for clinician review.

Evidence base

  • Meta-analyses (Salerni 2013; Adler 2017) — sequential digital dermoscopy substantially improves the diagnostic accuracy for melanoma in high-risk patients and reduces unnecessary excisions.
  • Average naevi excised per melanoma detected falls from ~30:1 in unaided clinic to ~4–8:1 with TBP/SDDI.
  • Earlier-stage melanoma detection — TBP-detected melanomas have thinner Breslow than incidentally-presenting tumours in matched cohorts.

UK access

  • Available in dedicated melanoma surveillance clinics in most cancer-network centres; private dermoscopy services widely provide it.
  • Reimbursement variable — most commonly bundled into the melanoma surveillance follow-up tariff.
  • Patient counselling — TBP supplements but does not replace photoprotection and self-examination.

References

  1. Salerni G et al. Benefits of total body photography and digital dermatoscopy in melanoma surveillance. J Am Acad Dermatol; 2012.
  2. Adler NR et al. Sequential digital dermoscopy imaging — meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol; 2017.
  3. NICE NG14. Melanoma: assessment and management. London: NICE; 2015 (last updated 27 July 2022), follow-up recommendations on dermoscopy / medical photography and personalised follow-up.

Spot a correction?

If any clinical statement, citation or link on this page needs updating, please email admin@skinoncology.net with the page name, the proposed correction and the supporting source.